Sylaps
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Video Conferencing
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Easy Setup
- Audio Quality
- Video Quality
- Screen Sharing
- High Quality
Cons
- Limited Features
- Missing Features
- Limited Integrations
- User Interface
- Participant Limitations
- Technical Issues
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 47.4% |
| Mid-Market | 32.8% |
| Enterprise | 19.8% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 2 | 3.5 |
| 2025 Q1 | 1 | — |
| 2025 Q2 | 2 | 4.5 |
| 2025 Q3 | 2 | 4.5 |
| 2025 Q4 | 11 | 4.5 |
| 2026 Q1 | 16 | 4.5 |
| 2026 Q2 | 11 | 4.2 |
| 2026 Q3 | 2 | 4.8 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Effortless Data Compliance and Meeting Management
“I love Sylaps’ automatic meeting transcript feature. It captures every client requirement in real-time, allowing our reps to focus on the client rather than scribbling notes. I also really appreciate the simple meeting permission controls that let us toggle recording consent prom”
Sylaps
“Sylaps is simple and easy to use. I like how convenient it is for online meetings and remote collaboration.”
Simple Yet Efficient, Lacks Advanced Features
“I find Sylaps very useful since no one needs to download an app or software. It excels by stripping away unnecessary bulk and focuses on speed, privacy, and low technical overhead. I appreciate how easy the initial setup was. I use Sylaps APIs and SDKs to integrate its seamless v”