Bluedot
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Note-Taking Software
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Accuracy
- Helpful
- AI Summary
- Transcripts
- Transcription
Cons
- Missing Features
- Recording Issues
- Transcript Accuracy
- AI Inaccuracy
- Expensive
- Limited Features
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 70.5% |
| Mid-Market | 20.5% |
| Enterprise | 9.0% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q2 | 34 | 4.8 |
| 2025 Q3 | 97 | 4.8 |
| 2025 Q4 | 75 | 4.6 |
| 2026 Q2 | 1 | 4.0 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Enhances Meeting Focus but Needs Flexible Access
“I really like Bluedot's ability to take notes and provide a full transcript of meetings, which helps me focus and engage without worrying about typing or writing notes. The audio recording feature and the option to capture videos enhance the experience significantly. Additionally”
Efficient Task Assignment, Needs Better Speaker ID
“I like that we can label each person, which helps in assigning tasks correctly. It's also great that we can take notes even when it's not on Zoom. The initial setup was easy, which was a relief.”
Effortless Note-Taking, Needs Better Teams Integration
“I love the fact that we can personalise and create templates for a specific type of call, such as recording an assessment. I also love that I don't need to take notes during the meeting and can just focus on what the client is saying, knowing I can read the notes after the meetin”