Stream Chat
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Communication Platform as a Service (CPaaS)
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Integrations
- Simple
- Features
- Easy Integrations
- API Integration
Cons
- Steep Learning Curve
- Analytics Limitations
- Poor Analytics
- Lack of Insights
- Difficult Setup
- Limitations
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 64.2% |
| Mid-Market | 22.6% |
| Enterprise | 13.2% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q2 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q4 | 6 | 4.3 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Effortless Integration and Excellent Documentation for Developers
“As working as developer, building chat or activity feeds are headache, it takes lot of time in coding and setting up things, stream took of all that with simple API and good documentation, integration was easy and fast, i have integrated stream in few projects now, the SDK's are ”
Stream Makes Real-Time Chat Integration Effortless for Developers
“I really like how Stream provides a powerful, developer-friendly API for building chat and activity feed features quickly. The documentation is clear, SDKs are well-structured, and the integration process feels smooth. It saves a huge amount of development time compared to buildi”
Effortless Video Sharing with Stream, But Upload Speed and Search Need Improvement
“I like Stream application because it is easy to use and connects well with teams and SharePoint. It makes the video sharing and training simple for everyone. It saves meeting recordings automatically and provides captions, helping teams to stay organized.”