SAP Sustainability Control Tower
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Sustainability Management
Pros and cons
Pros
- Data Management
- Ease of Use
- Efficiency Improvement
- ESG Management
- Sustainability
- Tracking
Cons
- Complex Setup
- Steep Learning Curve
- Difficult Learning
- Integration Issues
- Complexity
- Training Required
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 25.8% |
| Mid-Market | 39.4% |
| Enterprise | 34.8% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 | 15 | 4.2 |
| 2025 Q4 | 8 | 4.0 |
| 2026 Q1 | 7 | 4.4 |
| 2026 Q2 | 27 | 4.4 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Centralized Sustainability KPIs in One Place, With a Strong Focus on Measurable Impact
“I like the centralised data that it brings the sustainability KPIs and the indicators for the performance being all in one place. And I like the focus on measurable KPIs rather than sustainability being a statement for the orgs intention”
Easy Setup, Clear ESG Insights in One Place
“I like that SAP Sustainability Control Tower brings sustainability data and KPIs together in one place. It makes it easier for me to track performance and make decisions. I value the visibility into consumption, carbon emissions, and waste recovery metrics, which helps me evaluat”
Effective for ESG Reporting and Decarbonization
“I like the AI help in SAP Sustainability Control Tower, which assists me in setting goals and finding practical solutions, like decarbonization. I value the carbon footprint feature and find it useful for my work with EU tax considerations. The initial setup was quite easy, which”