SAP Sustainability Footprint Management
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Sustainability Management
Pros and cons
Pros
- Efficiency Improvement
- Data Management
- Tracking
- Integrations
- Sustainability Monitoring
- Ease of Use
Cons
- Complex Setup
- Implementation Difficulty
- Complexity
- Dependency Issues
- Expensive
- Data Management Issues
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 31.8% |
| Mid-Market | 28.8% |
| Enterprise | 39.4% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 | 8 | 4.4 |
| 2025 Q4 | 14 | 4.0 |
| 2026 Q1 | 14 | 4.5 |
| 2026 Q2 | 19 | 4.0 |
| 2026 Q3 | 2 | 4.0 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Centralizes Sustainability Data, Simplifies Tracking
“I like SAP Sustainability Footprint Management's ability to centralize sustainability data, which makes carbon footprint tracking easier. The clear insights help my team quickly identify emissions hotspots and find improvement opportunities. Its integration with SAP processes mak”
Clear Carbon Footprint Visibility and Actionable Sustainability Insights
“What I like most about SAP Sustainability Footprint Management is that it makes tracking and understanding sustainability data much easier. The platform offers clear visibility into carbon footprints and helps translate that information into actionable insights, so it’s easier to”
Streamlines Carbon Accounting but Challenging for Beginners
“I appreciate the in-built calculator in SAP Sustainability Footprint Management as it helps in carbon accounting without any hurdles.”