OctaMeet
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Video Conferencing
Pros and cons
Pros
- Easy Setup
- Ease of Use
- Video Quality
- Audio Quality
- Screen Sharing
- Reliability
Cons
- User Interface
- Screen Sharing
- Limited Customization
- Limited Features
- Limited Integrations
- Performance Delays
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 48.8% |
| Mid-Market | 34.1% |
| Enterprise | 17.1% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q2 | 4 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q4 | 6 | 4.5 |
| 2026 Q1 | 14 | 3.9 |
| 2026 Q2 | 9 | 4.8 |
| 2026 Q3 | 5 | 4.1 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
OctaMeet simplifies remote architecture project syncs yet falls short on high‑res blueprint collaboration for sustainable design workflows
“My standout favorite features are OctaMeet’s browser‑native meeting access and auto‑generated AI meeting transcripts and action‑item summaries. Clients and external engineering consultants can join blueprint review sessions without downloading extra software. After our residentia”
Lightweight, Easy Setup with Reliable Audio/Video for Daily Team Meetings
“It's straightforward to set up and use for internal meetings without a lot of onboarding friction, which matters for a small team that doesn't want to spend time training people on new tools. The video and audio quality has been reliable for day-to-day calls, and scheduling meeti”
Instant Meetings, Needs Better Host Controls
“I like the instant meeting feature in OctaMeet. Just click on start meet, and one more step for audio and camera permissions, and you are good to go. It's pretty easy to set up.”