Groupworld
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Screen Sharing
Pros and cons
Pros
- Team Collaboration
- Screen Sharing
- Video Conferencing
- Ease of Use
- Communication
- Video Quality
Cons
- Small Business Limitations
- Expensive
- Limited Customization
- User Interface
- Missing Features
- Participant Limitations
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 49.1% |
| Mid-Market | 35.8% |
| Enterprise | 15.1% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 2 | 4.0 |
| 2025 Q3 | 1 | — |
| 2025 Q4 | 3 | 4.0 |
| 2026 Q1 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 2026 Q2 | 2 | — |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Quality-Driven Projects with Strong Team-Client Coordination
“What I like best about Groupworld is its focus on delivering quality-driven projects while maintaining strong coordination between teams and clients.”
Its awesome :) A Great Virtual Meeting Tool for Real-Time Sharing and Annotation
“It’s a great tool for virtual meetings, where you can share documents, annotate in real-time, and have all participants actively engaged without any confusion”
Boosts Collaboration, Needs More Customization
“I love how Groupworld improves collaboration and transparency. Group members can communicate clearly, track progress, and stay engaged without confusion or missed messages. I especially appreciate the way it encourages focused, meaningful engagement. Conversations stay relevant, ”