StrongDM
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Customer Support
- Easy Management
- Setup Ease
- Intuitive
- Security
Cons
- Implementation Difficulty
- Lack of Features
- Complex Setup
- UX Improvement
- Poor Navigation
- Documentation
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15.2% |
| Mid-Market | 75.8% |
| Enterprise | 9.1% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 4 | 4.5 |
| 2025 Q1 | 3 | 4.3 |
| 2025 Q2 | 5 | 4.5 |
| 2025 Q3 | 3 | 4.7 |
| 2025 Q4 | 3 | 3.8 |
| 2026 Q1 | 5 | 4.8 |
| 2026 Q2 | 1 | 5.0 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Efficient Privileged Account Management
“I really like using StrongDM for server and database logins. It's quite easy to set up, and we've successfully onboarded 2000 users to it.”
Secure and User-Friendly Access Solution
“I find StrongDM very easy to use and user-friendly. It allows our team members to log in to servers without having to leverage their personal accounts, providing a secure way to access our servers. I like how it helps us access servers without revealing personal information, whic”
Effortless Deployment with Strong Security Controls
“I like how StrongDM helps us securely manage and control access to critical infrastructures like databases and servers. It enforces least-privilege access, eliminates shared credentials, and provides centralized auditing and visibility. I appreciate that the deployment cycle is s”