Oracle Health
239
Reviews
3.5
Star rating
#13
Rank in Medical Practice Management
Pros and cons
Pros
- Charting
- Ease of Use
Cons
- Slow Performance
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
-100.0%
-6
Enterprise
2
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4.6% |
| Mid-Market | 23.9% |
| Enterprise | 71.4% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q2 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 2025 Q3 | 1 | 3.5 |
| 2026 Q1 | 1 | 4.0 |
| 2026 Q2 | 1 | 3.0 |
Satisfaction ratings
Ease of Use7.5
Ease of Setup7.0
Quality of Support7.6
Meets Requirements8.1
What reviewers say
Comprehensive, feature-rich EHR
4.0
“One stop solution for complete archiving and management of electronic health records.”
Cerner as a physician in training
5.0
“The best part about Cerner was the ease of access to note writing tools, the simplicity of the user interface, and the elegant organization of lab values as well as easy access to Neuro imaging, which is heavily used as I am a neurologist in training.”
Works decently but wouldn’t consider outstanding
2.5
“It's easy to find information of specimen locations. Decently easy to use.”