Arctic Wolf
280
Reviews
4.7
Star rating
#3
Rank in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
Pros and cons
Pros
- Customer Support
- Threat Detection
- Cybersecurity
- Ease of Use
- Alerts
- Team Professionalism
Cons
- Expensive
- Learning Curve
- False Positives
- Cybersecurity Risks
- Missing Features
- Not User-Friendly
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
-100.0%
84
Mid-Market
5
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11.4% |
| Mid-Market | 69.3% |
| Enterprise | 19.3% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 3 | 4.8 |
| 2025 Q1 | 53 | 4.9 |
| 2025 Q2 | 18 | 4.9 |
| 2026 Q1 | 2 | 4.8 |
| 2026 Q2 | 5 | 4.8 |
Satisfaction ratings
Ease of Use9.3
Ease of Setup9.2
Quality of Support9.5
Meets Requirements9.5
What reviewers say
Keeps Us Secure with Proactive Suspicious Activity Alerts
5.0
“They help keep us secure, and they alert us if they ever notice anything suspicious.”
Used to be too expensive, but now we love it
4.5
“That it is connected to data sources relevant to our organizations overall security”
Effortless Log Management and Monitoring with Built-In Parsers
4.5
“It includes an MSP and takes away the need for me to manually monitor, configure and deal with building things out on my own. A lot of the logs they already have parsers built for - which means i don't have to build them out on my own - and they have a team that is always monitor”