Tenable Vulnerability Management
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Scanning Efficiency
- Vulnerability Identification
- Features
- Automated Scanning
- Solutions
Cons
- Expensive
- Pricing Issues
- Limited Reporting
- Inadequate Reporting
- Complexity
- Poor Reporting
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 16.3% |
| Mid-Market | 32.7% |
| Enterprise | 51.0% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 7 | 4.6 |
| 2025 Q3 | 2 | 4.8 |
| 2025 Q4 | 9 | 4.7 |
| 2026 Q1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 2026 Q2 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 2026 Q3 | 15 | 4.6 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Strong Vulnerability Validation and Prioritization, Even in Software Dependencies
“I appreciate the ability to validate vulnerabilities, including those that show up in software dependencies—for example, embedded Java components within Control-M Agent or Veritas.”
Making Vulnerability Management Easier
“Instead of looking only at CVSS severity, Tenable provides risk-based prioritization to help teams determine which vulnerabilities should be addressed first.”
Integración Perfecta y UI Amigable, Pero Paginación Puede Mejorar
“Me gustan mucho las integraciones de Tenable Vulnerability Management y su interfaz gráfica amigable. Además, la organización de la información y la manera en que se exponen los módulos también son aspectos que valoro mucho. Encuentro que la configuración es bastante intuitiva gr”