G2 Vendor Directory
47

Reviews

4.7

Star rating

#38

Rank in Session Replay

Pros and cons

Pros

    Cons

      Traffic & LLM citations

      Monthly G2.com page views and citations by AI answer engines for UXtweak.

      Page views and citations · UXtweak

      Source: G2 review data

      Winning from

      Based on reviewers who said they switched from another product.

      Losing to

      Based on reviewers of other products who said they switched from UXtweak.

      Key stats

      +200.0%

      86

      Small Business

      3

      Adoption by company size

      SegmentShare of reviews
      Small Business56.5%
      Mid-Market30.4%
      Enterprise13.0%

      Quarterly history

      QuarterReviewsStar rating
      2025 Q22—
      2025 Q32—
      2026 Q215.0
      2026 Q334.8

      Satisfaction ratings

      Ease of Use9.1
      Ease of Setup9.3
      Quality of Support9.8
      Meets Requirements9.6

      What reviewers say

      Intuitive and Easy to Use—Perfect for Educational Research

      5.0

      “What I like best about UXtweak is how intuitive and easy the platform is to use. Setting up my tree test, creating different tasks, collecting responses, and analyzing the results was very straightforward. I also really appreciated that UXtweak gave me the opportunity to use the ”

      Student

      UXTweak: Great UX Research Tools with Easy Surveys and Card Sorting

      4.5

      “I really like how UXTweak is a platform with multiple great tools to help me do UX Research. I'm using the survey tool a lot to gather asynchronous feedback and measure the utility and usefulness of our enterprise tool. I also really like the card sorting tool that is super easy ”

      UX Researcher

      Amazing platform for ux related research

      5.0

      “UXtweak gave me the opportunity to use their platform for free in an educational setting, and it made a huge difference in how I was able to teach and guide students through essential UX research methods like card sorting, tree testing and usability testing.”

      associate professor