Upland Qvidian
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in RFP
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Content Library
- Content Management
- Document Management
- RFP Management
- Efficiency
Cons
- Limited Features
- Not Intuitive
- Feature Usability
- User Difficulty
- Ineffective Search Functionality
- Update Issues
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12.3% |
| Mid-Market | 33.7% |
| Enterprise | 54.0% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q1 | 7 | 3.7 |
| 2025 Q2 | 26 | 4.5 |
| 2025 Q3 | 3 | 4.8 |
| 2025 Q4 | 3 | 3.7 |
| 2026 Q1 | 5 | 4.5 |
| 2026 Q2 | 10 | 4.5 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Essential Tool for Proposal Management
“I really like Upland Qvidian's integration with Microsoft Word. It simplifies access to our existing content for customization in new opportunities, and the structure is easy to follow.”
Solid RFP Tool with Great Version Control
“I like Upland Qvidian's version control and hierarchy, which is quite valuable for me. The great repository feature also stands out. The initial setup was relatively easy, making it convenient to start using.”
Effective RFP Management with Room for User-Friendly Improvements
“I like the library in Upland Qvidian where I can store answers and they are easily accessible. I also appreciate being able to insert answers easily, just by clicking one button.”