Inventive.AI
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in RFP
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Efficiency
- Time-saving
- Consistency in Responses
- Intuitive
- RFP Management
Cons
- Insufficient Analytics
- Poor Reporting
- Lack of Clarity
- Missing Features
- Access Management
- Inefficiency
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 42.7% |
| Mid-Market | 37.8% |
| Enterprise | 19.5% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 2 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q1 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q2 | 7 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q3 | 14 | 5.0 |
| 2026 Q2 | 32 | 4.8 |
| 2026 Q3 | 19 | 4.8 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Inventive Makes Presales Research and RFP Drafting Effortless
“Inventive has been really useful for the less interesting parts of presales work, especially when I’m researching questions and putting together a first draft of an RFP response. I also like its contextual approach, since the answer isn’t always pulled from a single old response.”
Inventive Streamlines Large Security Questionnaires Using Existing Documentation
“Inventive is especially useful when we’re dealing with large security questionnaires that include many questions we’ve already answered in the past. I appreciate that it can pull from our existing documentation instead of forcing us to manually maintain everything in a single lib”
Inventive Streamlines RFP Responses with Smart Context Pulling and Conflict Detection
“Inventive has made our RFP process far less dependent on manually digging through old responses. I appreciate that it can pull relevant context from multiple sources, rather than relying solely on a fixed Q&A library. The conflict detection is especially helpful when the same inf”