SAP Document and Reporting Compliance
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Disclosure Management
Pros and cons
Pros
Cons
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13.7% |
| Mid-Market | 41.2% |
| Enterprise | 45.1% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q1 | 27 | 4.1 |
| 2026 Q2 | 10 | 4.0 |
| 2026 Q3 | 1 | 4.5 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Manual formatting hours were cut across four
“I got this from three reports, did the formatting manually, and sent an email using a report that was a bit different from the finance report, which was sent out during the same week. It's a bit embarrassing. The question of what was right was the same question I was asked before”
Centralized document access through SAP Document and Reporting Compliance
“It's set up as a solution on SAP BTP, and it can use OData services on S/4HANA to access delivery and billing documents straight away. Every country will have its own channel that's required for E-documents to reach the tax authorities/PEPPOL. Missing SSO with Login through SAML.”
It took me about two weeks to set up the scenario
“The solution is on SAP BTP and connected to SAP S/4HANA via OData service. Outbound e-documents are sent to tax authorities and Peppol via country-specific channels. Authentication is done via SAML Single Sign On. There's a status history for each document, which I can see on the”