Salesforce Spiff
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Sales Compensation
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Real-time Tracking
- Transparency
- Integrations
- Visibility
- Automation
Cons
- Learning Curve
- Complexity
- Implementation Difficulty
- Expensive
- Data Management Issues
- Time-Consumption
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8.7% |
| Mid-Market | 71.9% |
| Enterprise | 19.5% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 3 | 1.5 |
| 2025 Q1 | 14 | 4.3 |
| 2025 Q2 | 33 | 4.3 |
| 2025 Q3 | 55 | 4.3 |
| 2025 Q4 | 69 | 4.3 |
| 2026 Q1 | 6 | 4.9 |
| 2026 Q2 | 9 | 4.1 |
| 2026 Q3 | 68 | 4.1 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Automated, Real-Time Commission Visibility That Simplifies Compensation
“What I like most about Salesforce Spiff is its ability to automate commission calculations and provide clear, real-time visibility into earnings. It reduces manual effort, improves accuracy, and makes compensation easier for both sales teams and managers to understand.”
Real-Time Commission Visibility That Keeps Us on Track
“Having the in the moment, time to see commissions. Being able to plan out the future of where the sales reps need to go to make their goals. And having the manager be able to see their team in the moment”
Spiff motiva al equipo de ventas, aunque cuesta explicarlo sin modelos de comisiones
“Hemos propuesto Spiff en las oprganizaciones y es impresionante como las empresas ven ahi mismo su potencial. Para un ejecutivo de ventas, el hecho de ver cuanto se ganara de comision, motiva mucho”