Llama
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Large Language Models (LLMs)
Pros and cons
Pros
- Accuracy
- Ease of Use
- Speed
- Open-Source
- Helpful
- Access
Cons
- Limitations
- Slow Performance
- Poor Response Quality
- Inaccuracy
- Limited Understanding
- Expensive
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 57.5% |
| Mid-Market | 24.2% |
| Enterprise | 18.3% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 3 | 4.8 |
| 2025 Q1 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q2 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q3 | 2 | 4.3 |
| 2025 Q4 | 3 | 4.5 |
| 2026 Q2 | 1 | 3.0 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
AI model that fits perfectly into our daily workflow for our telecare endusers
“What I like best is how natural and accurate the text generation is. We use Llama 3 70B through an internal tool connected to our CRM and website content system, mainly for drafting customer communications, refining service descriptions, and preparing product documentation. It un”
efficient AI model for business content and customer communication
“What I appreciate most is how balanced and reliable it is for professional use. We use Llama 3 70B mainly through our internal workspace accounts to create marketing content, assist in drafting client proposals, and summarize documentation for our telecare services. It’s very fas”
Powerful and reliable model for real business applications
“What I like most is its balance between accuracy, speed, and cost. Llama 3 70B generates very natural and professional content ideal for product descriptions, customer communication, and drafting emails for potential clients. It’s easy to integrate into our existing workflow, and”