Fellow
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Meeting Management
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Meeting Notes
- Note-taking
- Action Items
- Organization
- Integrations
Cons
- Meeting Management
- Task Management
- Template Issues
- Calendar Integration
- Integration Issues
- Note Management
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 33.3% |
| Mid-Market | 38.6% |
| Enterprise | 28.0% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 5 | 4.8 |
| 2025 Q1 | 3 | 4.8 |
| 2025 Q2 | 2 | 2.5 |
| 2025 Q3 | 4 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q4 | 123 | 4.5 |
| 2026 Q1 | 44 | 4.6 |
| 2026 Q2 | 32 | 4.6 |
| 2026 Q3 | 22 | 4.5 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Effortless Meetings with AI Integration
“I like Felllow for its ease of use and AI integration, especially the coach-me function, which is really helpful. I also appreciate how it allows the collation of multiple meetings and keeps the threads connected together, which is essential for my work.”
Effortless Meeting Summaries, Minor Navigation Hurdles
“I like using Fellow for its great meeting recording and summaries that make sense. It's also pretty handy for AI note-taking and managing action items. The setup was a doddle, which made it easy to get started.”
Easy to Use with Great Insights and Effortless Transcript Copying
“like how easy it is to use, i like you can copy and paste the full transcript, I like how easy it is to review, the insights”