Criteria
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Talent Assessment
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Assessments
- Candidate Management
- Insights
- Helpful
- Review Process
Cons
- Assessment Issues
- Missing Features
- Poor Customer Support
- Cost Issues
- Improvements Needed
- Insufficient Information
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 24.2% |
| Mid-Market | 51.7% |
| Enterprise | 24.2% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 5 | 4.5 |
| 2025 Q1 | 7 | 4.3 |
| 2025 Q2 | 6 | 4.6 |
| 2025 Q3 | 5 | 4.4 |
| 2025 Q4 | 3 | 3.8 |
| 2026 Q1 | 6 | 4.8 |
| 2026 Q2 | 5 | 4.3 |
| 2026 Q3 | 21 | 4.3 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
CCAT Makes Screening Candidates Fast and Effective
“I find the CCAT very useful in eliminating people who would struggle in our environment”
Collaborative Hiring Assessments That Reduce Fraud
“I appreciate that Criteria reaches out for our input on the product, how we use it, what needs to be done, and what’s happening in the industry. It’s great to have a partner that’s working with the changes in AI and helps my recruiters spend less time screening potentially wrong ”
Easy, Data-Driven Candidate Screening—with Room for Regional Nuance
“I like that Criteria is easy to use, rigorous, data driven, and efficient. I use UCAT, CCAT, and EPP, and Criteria lets me quickly screen out candidates who don’t meet baseline cognitive or functional requirements. Initial setup was very easy, with no problems.”