Claris FileMaker
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Workplace Innovation Platforms
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Flexibility
- Integration Capabilities
- Easy Creation
- Customizability
- Integration
Cons
- Learning Curve
- Navigation Difficulties
- Missing Features
- Limited Features
- Cost Issues
- Support Issues
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 66.6% |
| Mid-Market | 23.2% |
| Enterprise | 10.3% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q1 | 4 | 4.6 |
| 2025 Q2 | 10 | 4.7 |
| 2025 Q3 | 2 | 4.3 |
| 2025 Q4 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 2026 Q1 | 1 | 3.5 |
| 2026 Q2 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 2026 Q3 | 1 | 4.5 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Flexible and Integrative, but Needs Better Design Tools
“I like the flexibility of Claris FileMaker. I also appreciate how it's possible to integrate with nearly everything if you take the time to learn it. The Insert from URL script step is particularly useful as it allows the use of APIs from many vendors.”
Versatile but Steep Learning Curve
“I use Claris FileMaker for an app that manages our inventory, creation of repair tracking, and archiving. I also appreciate it for API calls to Mosyle. Claris allowed us to create an interactive platform for many users to input data. I like the ease of design ability and breadth ”
Powerful, Flexible, and Essential for Cross-Platform Data Management
“Claris FileMaker is a powerful and flexible tool that truly supports cross-platform development for custom database applications. Its speed and ease of implementation make it an excellent choice for managing complex data in a range of sectors, such as research, academia, and fina”