
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
217
Reviews
4.3
Star rating
#15
Rank in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
Pros and cons
Pros
Cons
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Key stats
—
54
Enterprise
1
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6.9% |
| Mid-Market | 16.6% |
| Enterprise | 76.5% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|
Satisfaction ratings
Ease of Use8.7
Ease of Setup8.6
Quality of Support8.9
Meets Requirements8.8
What reviewers say
Solid tool
4.5
“A single pane of glass to get an overall view of the risks in my environment.”
Notifies and report on vulnerability
4.5
“Easy to manage vulnerability using Talos and response to vulnerable threat on time. Easy configuration and onboarding process which has reduce our system risk. Integration with Cisco XDR help expedite incident response time.”
Good tool for Security related issue management
4.5
“The dashboards are clear and communicate the threaths nicely”