Cisco Secure Access
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platforms
Pros and cons
Pros
Cons
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 24.3% |
| Mid-Market | 43.2% |
| Enterprise | 32.4% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q3 | 70 | 4.3 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Easy & Reliable Corporate Network Connection with Smooth Troubleshooting
“It’s very easy to connect, and troubleshooting is also much easier than with other peers. I’m an avid user for connecting to the corporate network and getting my work set up for the day. I would highly recommend this to any of my peers.”
Cisco ACI: Intent-Based Workload Isolation with Whitelist Security
“Workload isolation in a Cisco ACI replaces traditional, static VLAN/ACL boundaries with an intent-based, whitelist security model enforced directly on the leaf switch ASIC. Traffic visualization is dropped by default unless an explicit contract permits it.”
Strong Zero Trust Platform, but Latency and Complex Policy Design Hold It Back
“it is a one stop solution to achieve zero trust framework with in house firewall & DNS defense and cloud security. It also helps enforces secure web access via proxy web security on the all standard protocols like - SAML or oAuth”