Check Point Endpoint Security
285
Reviews
4.5
Star rating
#2
Rank in Digital Forensics
Pros and cons
Pros
- Security
- Features
- Threat Detection
- Protection
- Ease of Use
- Threat Protection
Cons
- Slow Performance
- High Resource Usage
- Expensive
- Difficult Configuration
- Learning Curve
- High CPU Usage
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
+0.0%
72
Mid-Market
6
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20.2% |
| Mid-Market | 52.1% |
| Enterprise | 27.7% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 8 | 4.9 |
| 2025 Q1 | 2 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q2 | 33 | 4.5 |
| 2025 Q3 | 31 | 4.3 |
| 2025 Q4 | 35 | 4.3 |
| 2026 Q2 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 2026 Q3 | 1 | 4.0 |
Satisfaction ratings
Ease of Use9.1
Ease of Setup8.8
Quality of Support8.9
Meets Requirements9.1
What reviewers say
Firewall checkpoint
4.0
“El control de tantos equipos además de implementar código para realizar tareas en segundo plano”
Reliable Endpoint Security with Centralized Management
4.5
“It provides strong endpoint security with minimal impact on performance, along with an easy-to-use centralized management console that makes administration straightforward.”
Solid endpoint protection that's effective without being heavy.
4.5
“I like the strong prevention against malware, the fact that it doesn't slow devices down much, and how easy it is to manage from one place.”