IBM QRadar SIEM
340
Reviews
4.4
Star rating
#3
Rank in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA)
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Integrations
- Features
- User Interface
- Easy Integrations
- Monitoring
Cons
- UX Improvement
- Expensive
- Dashboard Issues
- Time-Consuming
- Cost
- Complexity
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
+200.0%
55
Enterprise
6
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 18.6% |
| Mid-Market | 28.7% |
| Enterprise | 52.7% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 4 | 4.3 |
| 2026 Q2 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 2026 Q3 | 3 | 3.2 |
Satisfaction ratings
Ease of Use8.6
Ease of Setup8.3
Quality of Support8.5
Meets Requirements8.8
What reviewers say
Strong Integrations and Reporting, but an Uncertain Future
3.5
“I liked it's ability to integrate with other systems and the ability to do netflow and the reportinmg capabilties”
QRADAR Integrates Easily and Makes Logs & Alerts Report-Ready
4.5
“QRADAR is easy to integrate, data in terms of logs and alerts are collected and perse in a reportable way.”
Collect and parsing log
4.5
“We use IBM Qradar to collect log for our customer, log have different server, computer , switch, firewall ecc and in this way we have one Siem that help us to collect and extend data retention of customer log, create different use case and generate offense for malicious activity”