Bullhorn
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Staffing
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- User Interface
- Integrations
- Efficiency
- Helpful
- Time-saving
Cons
- Slow Loading
- Slow Performance
- Performance Lag
- Learning Curve
- Limited Customization
- Missing Features
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 32.7% |
| Mid-Market | 50.4% |
| Enterprise | 17.0% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 381 | 4.5 |
| 2025 Q1 | 4 | 4.6 |
| 2025 Q2 | 3 | 4.2 |
| 2025 Q3 | 236 | 4.4 |
| 2025 Q4 | 4 | 4.9 |
| 2026 Q1 | 5 | 4.0 |
| 2026 Q2 | 4 | 3.6 |
| 2026 Q3 | 1 | 3.5 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Fuerte en Analytics, Inconveniencias con Integraciones
“Me gusta mucho la interfaz de Bullhorn, y también la conexión posible con servicios de telefonía como Ring Central, lo que nos ayuda a tener un transporte de conversaciones eficaz. Me parece muy interesante la parte de Full Analytics porque podemos crear dashboards que están siem”
Efficient Talent Pool Management with Bullhorn
“I use Bullhorn for sourcing, calling, and maintaining talent pools for hiring people. I love the Boolean search and the auto-build search. If there is any niche requirement, the feature of auto-build search helps in sourcing relevant candidates, and with Boolean search, I obvious”
Easy Navigation and Lightning-Fast Reporting
“Very easy to navigate and create reports that run in seconds, instead of having to construct them manually.”