Adobe FrameMaker
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Component Content Management Systems
Pros and cons
Pros
Cons
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 40.0% |
| Mid-Market | 37.1% |
| Enterprise | 22.9% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q1 | 1 | 4.5 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
The best documentation toll for PDF production
“FrameMaker is extremely stable and consistent. For example, you want a numbered list nested in another number list - thsi is handled with ease and always correct. It is very easy to learn the basics and create great looking documents. It integrated very well with Adobe Acrobat fo”
Great for multi- platform writings
“*Reliable & scaleable- can handle large size document without crashing the application. *Can be used for both structured and non structured documents. *Can create multiple chapters, section, page, figure, table numbering and multi-level lists * Ease in creating graphics and li”
XML to target or map content to SCORM
“Conditional text, table editor, book building, etc. and XML to target or map content.”