Titania Nipper InfraSight
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Reporting Quality
- Scanning Efficiency
- Vulnerability Detection
- User Interface
- Simple
Cons
- Licensing Issues
- Limited Scope
- Limited Compatibility
- False Positives
- Lack of Cloud Support
- Inadequate Reporting
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 25.9% |
| Mid-Market | 29.6% |
| Enterprise | 44.4% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q1 | 1 | 3.5 |
| 2026 Q1 | 19 | 4.5 |
| 2026 Q3 | 7 | 4.1 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Needs a Web Platform for Broader Use
“I like Titania Nipper InfraSight for the PCI DSS assessments, which stand out because they go beyond traditional configuration and vulnerability assessments. I also find it valuable for providing actual visibility and identifying gaps in network device configurations. The initial”
Fast Audits and Reports; Errors on some Config Files, CSV reporting and CVEs missing solutions
“The best thing about Nipper is that it completes audits very quickly in just a few minutes, so it removes a lot of manual hassles. It also provides comparison reports, which is another big plus. The interface is easy to use, and it includes all the required templates for scanning”
Titania Nipper InfraSight Delivers Fast, Audit-Ready Insights and Clear Remediation
“What I like best about Titania Nipper InfraSight is its ability to quickly identify network device misconfigurations and security weaknesses without requiring active scanning of production systems. The tool provides clear, actionable remediation guidance, supports compliance repo”