SAP Master Data Governance (MDG)
283
Reviews
4.4
Star rating
#3
Rank in Master Data Management (MDM)
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Data Management
- Data Quality
- Data Accuracy
- Data Centralization
- Data Integration
Cons
- Complex Setup
- Complex Implementation
- Data Management Issues
- Expensive
- Time-Consuming
- Integration Issues
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
-100.0%
57
Enterprise
3
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17.0% |
| Mid-Market | 31.2% |
| Enterprise | 51.8% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 32 | 4.4 |
| 2025 Q1 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q2 | 13 | 4.3 |
| 2025 Q3 | 2 | 4.3 |
| 2025 Q4 | 8 | 4.1 |
| 2026 Q2 | 10 | 3.6 |
Satisfaction ratings
Ease of Use8.8
Ease of Setup8.1
Quality of Support8.7
Meets Requirements9.0
What reviewers say
Great Single Source of Truth, but Complex Setup and Sync Challenges
3.0
“MDG allows me to centralise master data in a single, unique source of truth. It can also be connected to SAP and integrated with different applications.”
MDG Is a One-Stop Shop, but Navigating Multiple Screens Slows Us Down
3.5
“MDG serves as a one-stop shop for all the master data elements we use across the organization.”
Steep Learning Curve, Poor Integration
0.5
“I like the loads of all needed data upon completion of the CR.”