Peliqan
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Reverse ETL
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Integrations
- Easy Integrations
- Data Management
- Connectors
- Data Integration
Cons
- Learning Difficulty
- Required Technical Skills
- Feature Limitations
- Learning Curve
- Technical Expertise Required
- Steep Learning Curve
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 47.8% |
| Mid-Market | 43.3% |
| Enterprise | 8.9% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 3 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q1 | 6 | 4.8 |
| 2025 Q2 | 12 | 4.8 |
| 2025 Q3 | 12 | 4.8 |
| 2025 Q4 | 10 | 4.7 |
| 2026 Q1 | 7 | 4.9 |
| 2026 Q2 | 9 | 4.7 |
| 2026 Q3 | 9 | 5.0 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Mapped our own categories onto HubSpot
“Our HubSpot companies needed labels that HubSpot doesn't hold for us, like our internal region and account owner split. We kept that in a separate spreadsheet. With the Data Mapper we picked the companies table, kept the source columns read-only, and added our own columns for reg”
Loads straight into our own Snowflake
“We already had a Snowflake data warehouse and didn't want a second one. In Peliqan we added Snowflake as a connection and set it as the target, and now our pipelines from HubSpot, Stripe and Xero load into it. Our analysts kept working in the same place.”
Reached our on-prem SQL Server safely
“A large part of our data sits in a SQL Server on our own network, and it has to stay there. That ruled out most cloud tools for us. Peliqan gave us more than one way to connect it. We could whitelist their IPs on our firewall, set up a VPN, or install their Windows agent, Sate”