OpenText alternatives
Vendors whose G2 category profile most closely matches OpenText’s, weighted by where each one’s reviews actually sit.
| Vendor | Rating | Reviews | Growth (QoQ) | Categories | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Dropbox San Francisco, California | 4.4 | 39,178 | -78.5% | 20 | Compare |
 IBM Armonk, New York, United States | 4.3 | 12,195 | -23.3% | 270 | Compare |
 Microsoft Redmond, Washington | 4.4 | 103,081 | -71.5% | 326 | Compare |
 Acronis Schaffhausen | 4.5 | 2,292 | -75.0% | 20 | Compare |
 Wrike, Inc. San Diego, CA | 4.2 | 4,866 | -89.0% | 20 | Compare |
 Atlassian Sydney and San Francisco | 4.4 | 31,971 | -75.9% | 40 | Compare |
 Box Redwood City, CA | 4.3 | 6,933 | -86.2% | 10 | Compare |
 Zoho Austin, TX | 4.4 | 32,525 | -39.8% | 223 | Compare |
 Ziflow London | 4.5 | 945 | -50.0% | 2 | Compare |
 Sophos Oxfordshire | 4.6 | 2,780 | -79.1% | 28 | Compare |