MacPractice MD
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Medical Practice Management
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Navigation Ease
Cons
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 81.3% |
| Mid-Market | 18.8% |
| Enterprise | 0.0% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 1 | 0.0 |
| 2026 Q1 | 1 | 1.5 |
| 2026 Q2 | 1 | 4.0 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Fast, Easy-to-Train EDR with Customizable Forms and Planmeca 2D/3D Support
“The software is very quick when compared to other server based or cloud based EDRs. All forms can be custom designed or integrated. There is a window with tabs that allows quick access to forms. Wired Ethernet works better than wireless. It is Planmeca 2D and 3D friendly. It ”
MacPractice Does Basics But Is Outdated with Limited Integrations, Labor-Intensive Billing
“Stable platform overall, but Valsoft still hasn’t fixed some longstanding MacPractice bugs. At this point, there really aren’t any new things I like, because MP doesn’t seem to be developing or adding new features within the software.”
MacPractice MD Administrator
“1.It is very helpful to manage health organization. 2.This software has auto analysis features to provide requiredinformation. 3. It provodes charts for better analysis and review. 4. The shortcut keys provide quick access.”