KeeperPAM
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Flexibility
- Secure Access
- Security
- Integrations
- Easy Management
Cons
- Complex Setup
- Difficult Learning Process
- Complexity
- Difficult Learning
- Documentation
- Access Restrictions
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 0.0% |
| Mid-Market | 63.6% |
| Enterprise | 36.4% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 | 7 | 4.4 |
| 2025 Q4 | 4 | 4.8 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Keeper and its features are the best bang for the buck
“I like the fact that there is an abundance of features that are included.”
Flexible Gateway Solution That Streamlines and Secures Privileged Access
“I value the flexibility of deploying a multifunction gateway in different environments. With these gateways, I can use SSH, RDP, and tunneling, and I also have the ability to retrieve secrets from my vaults. This arrangement makes accessing highly privileged equipment both more s”
Deployment and usage of KeeperPAM
“It is easy to use since it integrates directly with the Keeper Vault. The distinction between users and devices simplifies managing credentials and allows sharing access with others without revealing the actual credentials. For us, the main use case was being able to grant develo”