HackerRank Developer Skills Platform
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Technical Skills Screening
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Assessments
- Candidate Management
- User Interface
- Interviewing Process
- Customization
Cons
- Assessment Issues
- Lack of Clarity
- Improvement Needed
- Limited Testing
- Subscription Limitations
- Missing Features
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8.9% |
| Mid-Market | 39.7% |
| Enterprise | 51.3% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 22 | 4.6 |
| 2025 Q1 | 29 | 4.5 |
| 2025 Q2 | 27 | 4.5 |
| 2025 Q3 | 18 | 4.6 |
| 2025 Q4 | 23 | 4.5 |
| 2026 Q1 | 11 | 4.7 |
| 2026 Q2 | 12 | 4.5 |
| 2026 Q3 | 9 | 4.4 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
MCQ + Coding Questions Give a Well-Rounded View of Candidates
“The questions include both MCQ and coding options. This helps me get an overall understanding of the candidate.”
Intuitive Onboarding, Smart Anti-Cheating, and Useful Interview Summaries
“We use it for System Design interviews and coding rounds. The UI is intuitive, and getting onboarded to the platform is straightforward. It also generates a PDF summary toward the end of the interview, which I’ve found helpful for review and follow-up. I also appreciate the built”
Great UI, Strong Integrations, and Top-Notch AI Capabilities
“The UI experience is great. The integrations across the available languages are very good, and the way we can work with AI/intelligence is also top-notch. Performance-wise, I haven’t seen any issues with the platform.”