GitLab
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Continuous Integration
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Features
- CI
- Integrations
- CD Integration
- Collaboration
Cons
- Complexity
- Difficult Learning
- Confusing Interface
- Complex User Interface
- Slow Performance
- Learning Curve
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 36.4% |
| Mid-Market | 36.9% |
| Enterprise | 26.7% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 5 | 4.8 |
| 2025 Q1 | 3 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q2 | 12 | 4.7 |
| 2025 Q3 | 14 | 4.5 |
| 2025 Q4 | 17 | 4.7 |
| 2026 Q1 | 8 | 4.6 |
| 2026 Q2 | 21 | 4.8 |
| 2026 Q3 | 6 | 4.6 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
GitLab as a Powerful Central Hub for Repos, Reviews, and Automation
“Gitlab is used extensively as the central hub of our team based workflow that handles repositories, branches, pull requests, and code reviews. Feature branches are used to control the scope of development work, and pull requests are used for reviewing, communicating, and ultimate”
Interfase Makes Project Management and Commit Tracking Simple
“Interfase is pretty solid. Managing projects feels really simple, and tracking commits and their history is just as straightforward.”
Projet partagé avec versioning : un vrai plus pour le travail en équipe
“Pouvoir disposer d’un projet partagé avec du versioning, c’est vraiment pratique pour les projets informatiques réalisés en groupe.”