AWS CodePipeline
69
Reviews
4.3
Star rating
#11
Rank in Continuous Integration
Pros and cons
Pros
- Integrations
- Easy Integrations
- Cloud Services
- Tools
- Features
- Tools Quality
Cons
- Complexity Issues
- Difficult Configuration
- Expensive
- Tool Integration
- API Limitations
- Dependency Issues
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
—
45
Small Business
4
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 36.2% |
| Mid-Market | 27.5% |
| Enterprise | 36.2% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q1 | 1 | 3.5 |
| 2025 Q2 | 3 | 4.3 |
| 2025 Q4 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 2026 Q1 | 1 | 4.0 |
| 2026 Q3 | 1 | 4.5 |
Satisfaction ratings
Ease of Use8.2
Ease of Setup8.2
Quality of Support9.0
Meets Requirements8.5
What reviewers say
Easy-to-Understand CI/CD Setup That Feels Familiar
4.0
“It’s similar to most CI/CD pipeline setups, so it’s easy to understand.”
Fantastic native AWS Integration for CI/CD use case.
4.5
“As this is a native tool, it is very easy to integrate Cloud formation, AWS lambdas and Service Catalogs that can benefit the AWS Code Pipeline, and we can see the logs information in the AWS flow logs.”
Devlopment with aws developer tools
4.5
“Aws is the go to place for cloud services. Developer tools enable us to keep everything from writing, managing, testing and deploying code all in one familiar platform”