GitHub Copilot
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in AI AppSec Assistants
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Coding Assistance
- Productivity Improvement
- Problem Solving
- Efficiency
- Time-saving
Cons
- Poor Coding
- Poor Suggestions
- Expensive
- Inaccuracy
- Context Understanding
- Difficult Learning
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 37.1% |
| Mid-Market | 32.7% |
| Enterprise | 30.1% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 5 | 4.4 |
| 2025 Q1 | 4 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q2 | 2 | 4.3 |
| 2025 Q3 | 9 | 4.3 |
| 2025 Q4 | 34 | 4.5 |
| 2026 Q1 | 42 | 4.4 |
| 2026 Q2 | 118 | 4.4 |
| 2026 Q3 | 43 | 4.2 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Write Code Faster with Helpful GitHub Copilot Suggestions
“I really like the new agent-based features in GitHub Copilot. It can handle larger coding tasks, work across multiple files, help review code, and even use the integrated browser to test web applications. The ability to run multiple coding sessions in parallel and see changes mor”
You can use: Great AI-Powered Storyboarding Experience
“Its biggest advantage is how quickly it generates useful code, completes repetitive tasks, and suggests fixes while I’m coding. It saves time and helps me solve problems without constantly searching for examples online.”
Easy # File Referencing Makes Bug Fixes Faster in Copilot
“I love how you can easily point to different files in Copilot by using the # marker to specify where you want to point it towards to fix bugs.”