eWorkOrders CMMS
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Facility Management
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Efficiency
- Setup Ease
- Data Management
- Implementation Ease
- Solution Comprehensive
Cons
- Slow Speed
- Limited Customization
- Difficult Setup
- Slow Performance
- Missing Features
- Poor Reporting
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 30.8% |
| Mid-Market | 50.0% |
| Enterprise | 19.2% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q1 | 1 | 4.0 |
| 2025 Q3 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q4 | 5 | 5.0 |
| 2026 Q1 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 2026 Q3 | 1 | 5.0 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Streamlined Maintenance with Intuitive Setup
“I like how eWorkOrders CMMS provides clear visibility into maintenance activity. The app keeps teams organized, simplifies task assignments, improves response time, and ensures nothing is missing during daily operations. The setup process was smooth and easy to follow. The system”
Streamlined Maintenance Across Multiple Locations
“I really like eWorkOrders CMMS because it allows me to set up a preventive maintenance plan on multiple pieces of equipment at the same time. This feature saves me significant time by applying the same preventive maintenance schedule across multiple assets in one action. It ensur”
Centralized CMMS with GIS Mapping Enhances Efficiency
“What I like most about eWorkOrders CMMS is the GIS mapping feature. It provides a visual map showing where assets and open work orders are located, helping teams quickly prioritize tasks, assign nearby staff, and respond efficiently without unnecessary delays.”