Everbridge 360 AI (Critical Event Management)
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Clinical Communication and Collaboration
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Alerts Management
- Features
- Communication
- Notifications
- User Interface
Cons
- Limitations
- Inefficiency
- Complexity
- Limited Functionality
- Integration Issues
- Notification Issues
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 29.0% |
| Mid-Market | 29.8% |
| Enterprise | 41.2% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 16 | 4.3 |
| 2025 Q1 | 24 | 4.6 |
| 2025 Q2 | 23 | 4.6 |
| 2025 Q3 | 11 | 4.5 |
| 2025 Q4 | 22 | 4.4 |
| 2026 Q1 | 27 | 4.4 |
| 2026 Q2 | 60 | 4.6 |
| 2026 Q3 | 17 | 4.2 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Easy Setup and Automated Coordination, with Room for Better Predictive Insights
“I use Everbridge 360 (Critical Event Management) to orchestrate coordinated demonstrations. I like being able to notify all key stakeholders at the same time, confirm attendance in real time, and automatically escalate if someone is missing. It gives me visibility into who is tru”
Fast Mass Alerts with Precise Geolocation and a Solid Everbridge Interface
“I like that I can manage mass alerts in a matter of seconds and send out notifications simultaneously. Everbridge also offers a solid interface and provides precise geolocation for our personnel.”
Reliable Incident Communications, Costly to Scale
“I like Everbridge 360's multi-channel delivery and visibility into who it reaches. I also like its two-way communication and acknowledgement feature. During an incident, I can ask building occupants a simple question and track their responses, which gives our incident lead a pict”