GlockApps
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Email Testing
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Detailed Analysis
- Accuracy
- Deliverability Improvement
- Platform Quality
- Reliability
Cons
- Difficult Learning
- Inadequate Reporting
- Lack of Features
- Verification Issues
- Payment Issues
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 74.1% |
| Mid-Market | 25.9% |
| Enterprise | 0.0% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 1 | 0.0 |
| 2025 Q3 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q4 | 6 | 4.6 |
| 2026 Q1 | 4 | 4.8 |
| 2026 Q3 | 3 | 5.0 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Solid inbox placement testing tool
“The seed list testing is the main reason we keep paying for it. Before we send a big campaign we run it through GlockApps first and it shows us where it's landing across Gmail, Outlook, Yahoo, etc. The content checker is also useful. We like action steps a lot as well, because we”
Helpful Tool for Email Deliverability Testing
“GlockApps makes email deliverability testing much easier. I like that it shows where emails land across different mailbox providers, including inbox, spam and promo. The reports are clear and help quickly understand what may be affecting inbox placement (from authentication issue”
Reliable Platform for Email Placement
“I like that GlockApps gives a realistic view of where emails actually land after sending. It helps me see whether a campaign reaches the inbox or ends up in spam, which is much more useful than only looking at delivery rates. The spam testing and inbox placement reports are easy ”