CLM 365
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM)
Pros and cons
Pros
- Process Improvement
- Easy Integrations
- Customer Support
- Ease of Use
- Setup Ease
Cons
- Contract Management
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 40.0% |
| Mid-Market | 60.0% |
| Enterprise | 0.0% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q1 | 10 | 5.0 |
| 2026 Q2 | 12 | 5.0 |
| 2026 Q3 | 8 | 4.9 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
We liked that the documents stay in SharePoint
“For us, the biggest advantage is that the documents remain in our SharePoint repository. We didn't want to upload sensitive contracts to another system and lose control of where they are stored. Our users can also access them through Microsoft Teams.”
Much easier to keep track of our contracts
“The reminders have been useful for us. We have a lot of contracts with different renewal dates, and it was difficult to keep track of everything in Excel. Now the team gets notifications before important dates.”
Microsoft 365 Integration was the main reason we chose it
“We were specifically looking for a Contract lifecycle management solution that worked with Microsoft 365. Since contract management integrates with SharePoint, Teams, Outlook, and Azure OpenAI, it fit perfectly into our existing environment. Our users didn't need to learn a compl”