Conga CLM
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM)
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Features
- Efficiency
- Contract Management
- Integrations
- Document Management
Cons
- Steep Learning Curve
- Learning Curve
- Time-Consuming
- Slow Performance
- Complex Setup
- Slow Loading
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 21.2% |
| Mid-Market | 40.5% |
| Enterprise | 38.2% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q1 | 48 | 4.9 |
| 2025 Q2 | 13 | 3.6 |
| 2025 Q3 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 2025 Q4 | 45 | 4.6 |
| 2026 Q1 | 9 | 4.4 |
| 2026 Q2 | 2 | 4.0 |
| 2026 Q3 | 2 | 4.8 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Powerful CLM Platform with Strong Salesforce Integration
“Conga has helped us centralise and streamline our contract lifecycle management processes within Salesforce. The platform provides strong automation for contract creation, approvals, document generation, e-signatures, and SAP integration workflows. While complex implementations ”
Flexible Templates and Seamless Salesforce Integration with Helpful Support
“Conga offers a great deal of flexibility and this allows us to build many document templates that may be used by the team in a variety of quoting scenarios and proposal situations. This makes life much easier to work in Salesforce. The integration with Salesforce was straightforw”
Great Tool for Contract Management
“it is seamless Salesforce integration and easy contract management process”