Canonical LXC
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Container Management
Pros and cons
Pros
- Features
- User Interface
- Container Management
- Simple
- Integration
- Flexibility
Cons
- Debugging Difficulties
- Poor Customer Support
- Lack of Control
- Limited Features
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 69.2% |
| Mid-Market | 23.1% |
| Enterprise | 7.7% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
LXC for startups
“LXC being an open-source resource, it's convenient as we get a lot of usage/troubleshooting info on the internet. And has an interface familiar to developers working on top of Linux/Unix variants, which makes goto for engineers in startups.”
LXC is a fantastic way to virtualize in a lean, efficient way.
“It's an effective way to have more isolated virtual containers on a server than most other virtualization approaches. With the feel of a full OS.”
Great technology for virtualisation
“I'm using the lxc container for virtualisation since long and so far I liked it more then kvm/ libvert or any other virtualisation technology. Great tool. Hats off to the developers. Keep it up mates!”