Proxmox VE
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Server Virtualization
Pros and cons
Pros
- Scalability
- Maintenance Ease
- Virtualization Management
- Integrations
- Snapshots
- Features
Cons
- Steep Learning Curve
- Required Expertise
- Performance Issues
- Network Issues
- Storage Issues
- Poor Documentation
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 61.5% |
| Mid-Market | 30.8% |
| Enterprise | 7.7% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q2 | 2 | 4.5 |
| 2025 Q3 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 2026 Q2 | 4 | 4.8 |
| 2026 Q3 | 2 | 4.8 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Exceptional Virtualization Density, Native Storage Support, and Value
“Proxmox VE offers an outstanding balance of performance, flexibility, and cost efficiency. The ability to run both full KVM virtual machines and lightweight LXC containers side-by-side in a single clean web interface makes resource management seamless. Its native out-of-the-box s”
VMware-Like UI Makes the Transition Effortless
“The environment and UI look similar to VMware, which makes the transition really easy.”
All-in-One Virtualization with Clustering, HA, and Flexible Storage
“What I like most about Proxmox VE is its straightforward, all-in-one simplicity. It brings VMs and containers together in one place, includes built-in clustering and HA, supports flexible storage options (ZFS, Ceph, etc.), and provides solid backup features—all without the exp”