Red Hat OpenShift
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Container Management
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Features
- Kubernetes Management
- Scalability
- Integrations
- Deployment Ease
Cons
- Learning Curve
- Complexity
- Configuration Complexity
- Complex Setup
- Not User-Friendly
- Expensive
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 24.1% |
| Mid-Market | 27.4% |
| Enterprise | 48.5% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 38 | 4.6 |
| 2025 Q1 | 3 | 4.8 |
| 2025 Q2 | 55 | 4.5 |
| 2025 Q4 | 5 | 4.0 |
| 2026 Q1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 2026 Q2 | 2 | 4.8 |
| 2026 Q3 | 2 | 5.0 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Dev-Topology View, Seamless Integrations, and Best-in-Class Security for Governance
“the most used feature by me is the dev-topology view, it show all the entities, be it anything, pvc, namespaces, etc at a glance and shows the disconnected/errors at a glance so no need to run multiple kubectl commands. Its integration with other external and inhouse tools is sea”
OpenShift Simplifies Kubernetes Orchestration
“The thing i like best about OpenShift that it helps orchestrate Kubernetes and simplifies a lot. I use it every day for 100+ microservices”
Versatile, Costly but Complex Cloud Solution
“I love that Red Hat OpenShift is built on Kubernetes, which significantly enhances my ability to streamline developer workflows. This integration allows me to leverage Kubernetes' powerful orchestration tools, providing a robust infrastructure for deploying and managing container”