Control-M
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Runbook Automation
Pros and cons
Pros
- Ease of Use
- Automation
- Features
- Time-saving
- Task Automation
- Monitoring
Cons
- Complexity
- Learning Curve
- Expensive
- Complex UI
- Difficult Learning
- Difficulty
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 24.4% |
| Mid-Market | 22.2% |
| Enterprise | 53.3% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 1 | 4.0 |
| 2025 Q1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 2025 Q3 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q4 | 36 | 4.5 |
| 2026 Q1 | 24 | 4.4 |
| 2026 Q2 | 12 | 4.3 |
| 2026 Q3 | 43 | 4.3 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Simple, Enterprise-Grade Automation That Delivers
“I like Control-M's simplicity and speed. It handles enterprise batch processing and workflow management well, and I like that it brings workload automation and workflows together on one enterprise platform. The way it processes and handles things simply is amazing. I appreciate i”
Streamlined Workflow Automation, Though Cost and Compatibility Give Pause
“I like Control-M’s automation and workflow tools. I can monitor complex business workflows from a single point, which gives me a single source of truth. It makes repetitive, multi-step tasks simpler, and I believe it can reduce manual processing time by at least 30%. I also like ”
Easy Deployment and File Movement, with Room to Improve Analytics
“I like having a single control point. I use Control-M to build, test, and automate pipelines, and I found the initial setup pretty easy.”