Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Runbook Automation
Pros and cons
Pros
- Automation
- Automation Efficiency
- Ease of Use
- Easy Integrations
- Task Automation
- Ansible Playbooks
Cons
- Learning Difficulty
- Learning Curve
- Complexity
- Complex Setup
- Automation Issues
- Difficult Setup
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 16.4% |
| Mid-Market | 35.2% |
| Enterprise | 48.4% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 28 | 4.6 |
| 2025 Q1 | 1 | 4.0 |
| 2025 Q2 | 63 | 4.5 |
| 2025 Q4 | 3 | 5.0 |
| 2026 Q1 | 2 | 5.0 |
| 2026 Q2 | 1 | 4.0 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Powerful automation tool with a slight learning curve
“What I appreciate most is how consistent and repeatable our server provisioning and deployments have become using YAML playbooks. It handles both Linux and Windows environments smoothly, and integrating it into our existing CI/CD pipelines was relatively straightforward. The coll”
Automatización Eficiente con Algunas Curvas de Aprendizaje
“Me gusta la simplicidad de Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform. No necesita agente en los servidores, solo SSH, lo que facilita mucho el manejo. También aprecio que los playbooks en YAML sean fáciles de leer y mantener. Además, usar playbooks para automatizar tareas elimina las t”
Best-in-Class Agentless Linux Security with Complete Features
“best feature for Linux platform as it is agentless and having complete feature required linux system upto date and vulnerable free”