G2 Vendor Directory
60

Reviews

4.7

Star rating

#17

Rank in Text Analysis

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Ease of Use
  • Useful
  • Efficiency
  • Intuitive
  • Time-saving
  • Categorization

Cons

  • Error Handling
  • Limited Language Support
  • Data Inaccuracy

Traffic & LLM citations

Monthly G2.com page views and citations by AI answer engines for ATLAS.ti.

Page views and citations · ATLAS.ti

Source: G2 review data

Winning from

Based on reviewers who said they switched from another product.

Losing to

Based on reviewers of other products who said they switched from ATLAS.ti.

Key stats

-100.0%

83

Small Business

2

Adoption by company size

SegmentShare of reviews
Small Business39.0%
Mid-Market33.9%
Enterprise27.1%

Quarterly history

QuarterReviewsStar rating
2024 Q415.0
2026 Q215.0

Satisfaction ratings

Ease of Use9.2
Ease of Setup9.3
Quality of Support9.8
Meets Requirements9.4

What reviewers say

I used Bravo for 15 years. Atlas is a far better product.

5.0

“Running tournaments with Atlas is so easy compared to Bravo. No more seat cards and I know the names and where their seats are for every player. I love it.”

Shift Manager

Atlas.TI em pesquisas

4.5

“I'm happy using Atlas.ti. It's fantastic software and it's helping me in my research. It is innovative, has a comfortable and intuitive look. I used it in my master's research and to write academic articles. Excellent for content analysis and bibliographic review. The super team ”

I use ATLAS.ti for academic research.

Game changer for qualitative and quantitative research

4.5

“I use ATLAS.ti for helping me conducting coding analysis and of course for quantitative analysis from the coding result. Its help me a lot, efficient, and safe my time!”

연구원 - Researcher (UX and HCI), Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department