Applied TAM
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Insurance Agency Management Systems
Pros and cons
Pros
- Data Management
- Features
Cons
- Workflow Inefficiency
- Outdated Design
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 73.2% |
| Mid-Market | 25.0% |
| Enterprise | 1.8% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q2 | 1 | 3.5 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
TAM may be a cost efficient solution
“TAM was reasonably easy to use and was not as overwhelming at first glance for new users as Epic can be. TAM has many capabilities and maybe a cost-efficient solution for smaller agencies. For an agency more interested in efficiency and advanced capabilities, Epic is definitely t”
TAM was fine for the time, but things have advanced and Epic is the way to go.
“At the time, it was easy to use. It was heavily activity based and fairly intuitive. If you want to use open activities to control your workload, this is the way to go. However, in comparison to Epic, it is antequated in the way it looks and connects to other Applied-owned sol”
Tam Review
“I can hidethe inactive policies or coverages that don't pertain to me. Easy Billing”