Adobe Stock
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Stock Footage
Pros and cons
Pros
- Images
- Photos
- Templates
- Quality
- Ease of Use
- Collection Quality
Cons
- Pricing Issues
- Limited Images
- Expensive
- Cost
- Limited Selection
- Ineffective
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 70.5% |
| Mid-Market | 19.7% |
| Enterprise | 9.8% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 2026 Q1 | 3 | 3.7 |
| 2026 Q2 | 9 | 4.2 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Incredible, Non-Cringe Stock Imagery That Elevates Creative Work
“Adobe Stock offers an unprecedented level of incredible stock imagery, that truly doesn't feel like traditional 'cringey' stock photography and illustrations.”
Diverse Stock Images and Seamless Adobe Integration, but AI Is Changing the Landscape
“It's got a good collection of stock images. The diversity between ethnicity and moods of the stock images is quite good and usable. The pricing plans are not too steep. Integration with other softwares, especially with Adobe seems to be pretty seamless.”
Reliable stock asset library with great quality.
“It has a really strong library, especially for professional-looking photos, vectors, and templates. The quality is noticeably better than a lot of free stock sites. What I personally liked is how smoothly it integrates with Photoshop and Illustrator. You can preview watermarked ”