G2 Vendor Directory

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs. Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricTenable Vulnerability Management

by Tenable

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)

by Cisco

Overall rating4.64.3
Review count153217
Ease of use9.18.7
Ease of setup9.18.6
Quality of support8.58.9
Meets requirements9.18.8
NPS79.7202853.5
Small Business16.3%6.9%
Mid-Market32.7%16.6%
Enterprise51.0%76.5%
Total page views1,058305
Total LLM citations8,9461,009

Tenable Vulnerability Management

Tenable Vulnerability Management provides a risk-based approach to identifying, prioritizing, and remediating vulnerabilities across your entire attack surface. Powered by Nessus technology and AI-driven analytics, it goes beyond CVSS scores to assess exploitability, asset criticality, and business impact—so you can focus on what matters most. With continuous visibility, automated scanning, and real-time risk insights, security teams can quickly expose and close critical vulnerabilities before they’re exploited.

Pros

  • Ease of Use
  • Scanning Efficiency
  • Vulnerability Identification
  • Features
  • Automated Scanning
  • Solutions

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM), the original SaaS risk-based vulnerability management platform, prioritizes vulnerabilities that pose a real risk, enabling Security and IT teams to focus their limited resources and remediate more efficiently. Cisco’s data science-driven prioritization evaluates both enterprise data and a wealth of data on real-world exploit activity and translates that context into actionable intelligence to guide remediation.

Pros